The New Girl on the Block

As promised, Tiki now has a new friend--Irene--named after two aunts. Both my mom and my dad had a sister by that name. One Aunt Irene is still thriving near Chicago; the other passed away in December. They were a year apart and now in their nineties. I maintain that being named Irene is the secret to longevity.

This new Irene is 6 years old and a Petit basset griffon Vendeen like Jina. She is beautiful, as you can see by her picture. In addition, she is well-behaved, not timid, happy, healthy, and wise.

I am comforted as she lies curled up at my feet, trying to figure out this machine that keeps me immobile for so many hours. We both have our inner lives. Mine comes out through speech and writing; hers comes out through her snuffles and movements. I'm hard pressed to say which is best.

A truth commission is a good idea as far as it goes...

Dear Senator Leahy,

While I think your idea of a truth commission is good, I do not feel it goes far enough. Without looking for "vengeance" we will not accomplish the task of preventing these heinous acts from recurring. I would suggest you refer to Prof. Alfred McCoy's book "A Question of Torture" where he cites previous examples of torture and the cycle that leads to impunity.

I think we Americans know enough of the truth to realize that torture can happen easily without the rule of law. We need to bring the torturers and their implementers to justice and, yes, punish the guilty. Without these actions, we are supporting a Latin America-like impunity that will continue to destroy our country.

So, I will sign the petition to bring up the truth commission, but with the caveat that we need to not sing "kum baya" and go home feeling good, but that we need to punish the guilty to the full extent of the law.

Regards,
Barbara Karn

US Impunity is Wrong

I find I cannot let this torture horror go. On yesterday's Democracy Now program, Amy Goodman interviewed Alfred McCoy about Obama's not addressing the issue of torture beyond the release of the torture memos. McCoy, a history professor from the University of Wisconsin, cited instances of past torture by the CIA where a. the public found out, b. Congress got in a frazzle, c. no one was prosecuted, d. all was forgotten, and a-redux, the whole cycle was repeated. His 2006 book documents this sordid past.

The program featured a video of Condaleezza Rice dancing around the torture issue with some Stanford students, saying essentially the barbarians at the gate called for desperate measures after 9-11. McCoy points out how the South American dictators used the same arguments to torture their own people. I'm not sure how many Americans were tortured by Bush. Certainly, he terrorized US citizens to the extent that they would not speak out in spite of the "big sister" warnings in the Metro-"See it; say it." I felt I was in China during the Cultural Revolution getting my parents imprisoned as imperialistic intellectuals for bad words against the state. No jokes at the airport I find particularly oppressive...maybe getting arrested for bad puns or accordion jokes is OK, but turning air travelers into humorless automatons is beyond my pale.

What struck me most was McCoy's using the word impunity. It means "exemption from punishment, penalty, or harm," according to my hardback big, fat American Heritage Dictionary. ( I tend to get impunity mixed up with impugn, so I have thought that impunity was the same as impugning, rather than nearly its opposite.)

I found an internet site called Impunidad. The first line states,"Impunity. Perhaps no word defines the experiences of Latin America as well as this one," and goes on to say how the guilty are free and often at their old posts where they can do it (torture, kill) again. They state, "Impunity without doubt is one of the gravest problems affecting the continent, and one that needs to be urgently addressed."

I would maintain that the continent includes the land mass to the north and that we need to urgently address this grave problem. Let's start with Bush and Cheney and move to all the signers and signifiers of the torture memos and the apologists like Rice. Let's prosecute them and punish them for their crimes against humanity and especially for their crimes against the USA. Let us return to the rule of law.

May Day

When we were kids, May Day was a big deal--pageants, dances around the pole and flowers for Mom. One year, we were probably 6 and 8, my brother and I picked violets and dandelions and arranged them in a little basket we made out of cardboard. We hung this basket on our front door, knocked (we didn't have a door bell), ran, and hid behind some bushes.

My mom opened the door, looked around and went back into the house. We sneaked out, knocked, and hid again. For the second time, my mom came out, wiping her hands from the dishwater, looked puzzled, and closed the door.

The third time she came out, she was really mad.."You kids are gonna get it, if you do this once more!" Then, she saw the basket...we got a great big mom-hug. Maybe she had tears in her eyes, but kids wouldn't notice that.

Dogs and Civilization

Here's a Kahlil Gibran story from The Wanderer. The comfort of dogs comes from their living on the fringes of civilization and keeping us honest about our animal roots. If I come back after death, it's a dog I want to be--and be housed with any of the cool people I know.

Peace and War
Three dogs were basking in the sun and conversing. The first dog said dreamily,"It is indeed wondrous to be living in this day of dogdom. Consider the ease with which we travel under the sea, upon the earth and even in the sky. And meditate for a moment upon the inventions brought forth for the comfort of dogs, even for our eyes and ears and noses."

And the second dog spoke and he said, "We are more heedful of the arts. We bark at the moon more rhythmically than did our forefathers. And when we gaze at ourselves in the water we see that our features are clearer than the features of yesterday."

Then the third dog spoke and said, "But what interests me most and beguiles my mind is the tranquil understanding between dogdoms."

At that very moment they looked, and lo, the dog-catcher was approaching.

The three dogs sprang up and scampered down the street: and as they ran the third dog said, "For God's sake, run for your lives. Civilization is after us."

Factoids and Babies

I used the word "factoid" today and realized I just might not know what it means. Indeed, when I looked it up, Washington State advised me not to use the term, stating: The “-oid” ending in English is normally added to a word to indicate that an item is not the real thing. A humanoid is not quite human. Originally “factoid” was an ironic term indicating that the “fact” being offered was not actually factual. However, CNN and other sources have taken to treating the “-oid” as if it were a mere diminutive, and using the term to mean “trivial but true fact.” As a result, the definition of “factoid” is hopelessly confused and it’s probably better to avoid using the term altogether.

I use it to mean not terribly precise, but close enough-- short facts of interest and worthy of storing for future use. These "facts" are usually out of date as soon as they are written down. My sense actually captures both parts--not quite true and short. The crux of the word seems to me not absolute truth but truth as a moving target.

There is an interesting video that gives many facts/factoids that will rapidly change. At one point the video states that during the time I was watching, 67 babies were born in the US, along with 274 in China and 395 in India. Obviously, these numbers--factoids--will change. They may be close to what is happening, but certainly 67 babies at the 4 minute and 30 second point of the video is a bit too precise for me to believe... and what if I stopped it before getting the Chinese or Indian number.

The point is that factoid is a perfectly good term (and precision in babies over 4.5 minutes is impossible) and very useful in our era of changing information. So, Mr. Webster, do I get the job?

The Synesthetic Quality of Music

I'm in New Orleans for the Jazz Fest which starts tomorrow. Yesterday I read a Jasper Johns quote related to the painting shown.
"As for the Cézanne [Bather], it has a synesthetic quality that gives it great sensuality—it makes looking equivalent to touching." So if looking is the equivalent of touching, then what is listening?
I would maintain that it is beyond touching. Some music is the equivalent of just making out--a few deep kisses but mainly lots of embracing (maybe 75% frontal touching). This could be a George Benson or a Strauss waltz--light, not too serious, predictable and easy to leave.
Other music might be the equivalent of heavy petting, short of full coupling, but getting there. Ravel, Etta James, Albinoni, the Stones come to mind--very separate in their approaches, but the touching is equivalent.
Then there are the over the top touchings--in all the right places--and here Wagner stands out as do many tenor voices singing to their Aidas or Toscas or Mimis(at least for my female parts--guys, fill in your own blanks), even Aaron Neville singing a capella.
Over the next 3 days, I expect experiences beyond touching. Check out the touchers.